The Colorado Institute of Technology is quietly closing its doors, six years after it was created amid hopes of someday rivaling Caltech and MIT as an educational powerhouse churning out digital-age engineers. Tech facility closing
In my experience regional authorities get the best results in “creating technology clusters” by recruiting market forces into the process. Essentially, private equity investors and venture capitalists will inadvertently create more sustained regional economic growth than a government committee.
Quoting Brad Feld a Colorado venture capitalist, on the closure of the Colorado Institute of Technology.
Education is at the core of creating a great, long term, entrepreneurial environment. While a few people in Colorado, such as Jared Polis, are doing great things, our state government and business leaders should look at the failure of CIT as a major wake up call that we are simply not doing enough, or the right things, or managing them effectively, I wasnt involved in CIT, so its hard to be specifically critical, as Ive spent most of my Colorado-based entrepreneurial – education activity working with CU Boulder Deming Center for Entrepreneurship and the CU Denver Bard Center for Entrepreneurship, but Id hypothesize that if the companies that invested energy and money into CIT had channeled the same energy and money into these two institutions, there would have been a better outcome.
The most successful technology parks I have visited have a resident marketing & sales support department, and the worst performing parks focus on technology support. St John’s Technology Park in Cambridge (UK) has a great commercial support team and a great tenancy record.
[Disclosure: I am a serial entrepreneur, my views may be biased]